Activity
From 09/05/2013 to 10/04/2013
09/19/2013
- 03:00 PM Software Development: RE: Writing UBIFS rootfs to AM3354 with 512MB NAND
- Thanks for the procedure. In case you weren't aware I wrote up a guide on doing this without the kernel being stored...
- 02:41 PM Software Development: RE: Writing UBIFS rootfs to AM3354 with 512MB NAND
- The procedure is simple - I create a UBI image (mkfs.ubifs & ubinize) with uImage and rootfile system volumes and pro...
09/17/2013
- 02:50 PM Software Development: RE: Writing UBIFS rootfs to AM3354 with 512MB NAND
- Michael,
I've added your changes including my alternative change to a test branch on my machine. If you could tes... - 02:48 PM Software Development: RE: Writing UBIFS rootfs to AM3354 with 512MB NAND
- Ok cool. We've never tried storing the kernel in a ubifs partition. If you have it working I'd be interested in you...
- 02:31 PM Software Development: RE: Writing UBIFS rootfs to AM3354 with 512MB NAND
- ...
- 02:17 PM Software Development: RE: Writing UBIFS rootfs to AM3354 with 512MB NAND
- Do you have a reference for your first change? Or did you find this through trial and error?
- 02:14 PM Software Development: RE: Writing UBIFS rootfs to AM3354 with 512MB NAND
- Michael,
You should be able to replace your second change with:... - 01:41 PM Software Development: RE: Writing UBIFS rootfs to AM3354 with 512MB NAND
- To boot from UBI with the 512MB NAND, I had to modify the 2013.01 branch bootloader:...
09/09/2013
- 03:40 PM Software Development: RE: Yocto in the future?
- One other thing... you will need to set defconfig to the appropriate config file - it is easiest just to copy this f...
- 02:48 PM Software Development: RE: Yocto in the future?
- Sure. First I should make clear the Yocto version - it is *dylan*-9.0.0 , not denzil. This is also Yocto/Poky... la...
- 08:42 AM Software Development: RE: Yocto in the future?
- Thanks Michael for the update. Would you be willing to share the steps you did to get it working or maybe just the w...
09/07/2013
- 04:32 PM Software Development: RE: Yocto in the future?
- 3.2 Kernel appears to run fine under Yocto (denzil-9.0.0).
- 07:35 AM Software Development: RE: High Latency for GPIO Interrupts in 3.2 Kernel
- Thanks Michael,
We'll get it applied in the local tree (which came from TI, really).
Sorry for the inconvenie... - 03:37 AM Software Development: RE: High Latency for GPIO Interrupts in 3.2 Kernel
- This is a bug in the kernel. Lines 215-219 of the file arch/arm/mach-omap2/irq.c should be modified:...
09/06/2013
- 11:25 PM Software Development: RE: High Latency for GPIO Interrupts in 3.2 Kernel
- The GPIO interrupt is on GPIO bank 0. Is there any chance that there is power management being applied to the GPIO o...
- 11:06 PM Software Development: RE: High Latency for GPIO Interrupts in 3.2 Kernel
- Kernel Module.
- 08:12 PM Software Development: RE: High Latency for GPIO Interrupts in 3.2 Kernel
- Are you handling the interrupts in a kernel module or via the gpio sysfs file hooks?
- Just switched over to the 3.2 Kernel from 3.1 to support programming of the 512MB flash, and the latency for a GPIO I...
Also available in: Atom
Go to top